Difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray
![difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray](https://soredexdigoraoptimeintraoralimag.weebly.com/uploads/2/2/3/3/22330544/s479538943104968375_p71_i1_w375.jpeg)
- #Difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray software
- #Difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray iso
#Difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray software
The digital images were numbered by Scanora 5.0 software (Soredex Corp, Helsinki, Finland) ( Fig. Radiographic images of each sample were obtained with Digora storage phosphor plates (Soredex Corp, Helsinki, Finland) and its special scanner, the Digora Optime (Soredex Corp, Helsinki, Finland), using a Prostyle dental X-ray unit (Planmeca OY, Helsinki, Finland) operating at 63 kVp, 8 mA, and 1.5-mm Al-equivalent filtration for 0.03 s. The standard geometric configuration was fixed at a 30-cm source-to-object distance. A Rinn-Endo-Ray film holder (Dentsply/Rinn Corporation, Elgin, IL, USA) was used to ensure parallelism. In order to eliminate the radiographic magnification, a 10-mm round orthodontic wire was placed in the adjacent dental socket and fixed with wax. Afterward, the samples were placed in suitable sockets of a dry human mandible to reproduce the bone density. Then, the files were inserted into the canals again and fixed with flowable composite resin (Tetric® Flow, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein).
![difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray](http://soredexdigoraoptimeintraoralimag.weebly.com/uploads/2/2/3/3/22330544/s479538943104968375_p79_i1_w320.jpeg)
Only teeth with a length of 20-24 mm were included. The file length was measured with a digital caliper to the nearest 0.01 millimeter (Guilin Guanglu Measuring Instrument Co., Ltd., Guilin, China), and the file was shortened by 0.5 mm, which was set as the standard value for the endodontic file length ( Fig.
#Difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray iso
ISO #08 K-files (Mani Inc., Utsunomiya, Japan) were inserted into the canals until the tips of the files were just visible at the apical foramen ( Fig. Gates-Glidden #3 and #4 drills (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were used to enlarge the coronal and middle thirds of the root canals. An anatomic access cavity was prepared with #008 and #010 fissure burs and an Endo-Z bur (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) in a high-speed handpiece. Conventional periapical radiography was used to verify any abnormalities or pathologies, such as internal/external root resorption, root canal obliteration/calcification, or severe curvature. The samples were cleaned and disinfected by scaling and soaking in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 12 h and stored in distilled water at 4℃ during the study. Periodontal or prosthetic problems were the reasons for extraction of the teeth. The teeth had only one root canal, measuring 20-24 mm in length.
![difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray difference between soredex and acteon digora optime x ray](https://www.picclickimg.com/d/l400/pict/144138905135_/Soredex-Digora-OpTime-DXR-50-Dental-Scanner-000-03-SEPT.jpg)
Thirty-five human-extracted single-rooted permanent teeth with intact crowns and roots were used in this experimental study.